We've noticed your using a old browser this may cause issuse when experincing our site. We recommend updating your browser here this provides the latest browsers for you to download. This just makes sure your experince our website and all others websites in the best possible way. Close

Are ARRS staff worth the hassle? – By Ben Gowland

Some Practice Managers have reported that they feel bringing in ARRS (Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme) staff can be confusing. The question is whether it’s worth persevering with them or whether practices would be better just focussing on their own practice staff?

Sometimes PMs may also face the quandary of where the new team member will work. Even though the practice is already bursting at the seams, the expectation is that space will be found from somewhere so that these new staff can run clinics. Or sometimes space can’t be found and so the new staff members work remotely.

Booking patients in to see the new staff can also be a challenge. They often operate on different systems to those used within the practice, taking up huge swathes of extra admin time just to ensure that the slots are booked.

ARRS staff make up over half of the additional investment that’s been made into general practice since 2019, and now make up (very) approximately 10% of the total funding for general practice. At a time when general practice finances are possibly as tight as they’ve ever been, practices have to make the most of all the resources that are available, and this level of funding is simply too large for practices to turn their backs on and thrive financially.

The situation with ARRS staff is also improving. There’s no new ARRS funding this year, so the seemingly continuous cycle of recruitment that’s been going on for the last five years is coming to an end. As practices get used to the new roles, and the new roles get used to working in practices, the value that they bring grows over time.

The numbers of ARRS staff are also very different compared with a couple of years ago. Previously, the new staff had to be shared across all the practices in a PCN, but now there are far more staff and it’s much more possible for PCNs to allocate or link staff to one or two practices, which in turn enables them to become a more integrated part of the practice team.

Reception/care navigation teams are also becoming more adept at booking patients to see the right professional. It was always going to take time to get used to such a rapid development of skill mix, but finally we’re seeing teams feeling much more comfortable with the new range of roles. Patients themselves are still taking a bit of time to adapt, but this is being helped by campaigns such as the IGPM’s Right Care First Time which practices can use to educate their patients about the benefits of not seeing a doctor every time they attend. Robyn Clark and Kay Keane talked more about this campaign in this month’s podcast.

While there’s no doubt that the introduction of the additional roles has been extremely challenging for many Practice Managers, the level of resource they now represent for general practice, along with the improvements to how they’re working with practices, means that they’re worth the effort for PMs, with more benefits to come in future as they become better embedded into individual practice working.

Rating

Ben Gowland

Director and founder Ockham Healthcare, presenter of The General Practice Podcast, supporting innovation in General Practice

View all posts by Ben Gowland
Primary care news round-up (12th to 18th January 2024)

January 18, 2024

Primary care news round-up (9th to 15th February 2024)

February 15, 2024

5 Responses to “Are ARRS staff worth the hassle? – By Ben Gowland”
  1. Anon Says:

    Good way to insult over 31,000 members of staff who already get treated like lower class citizens within PCNs.

    Reply

  2. Sarah Cole Says:

    I have to disagree with this – most of the issues raised in the article can be easily resolved by the PCN Manager and the Practice Manager communicating properly and working out clear lines of responsibility. “Free” resource to the practice is worth a bit of effort surely!? Where there is a good relationship between the PCN and it’s practices, ARRS staff can be worth their weight in gold so please don’t assume it’s the same for everyone!

    Reply

    • Ben Gowland Says:

      I think we are actually agreeing! I am saying that ARRS staff are worth investing effort in, even though I recognise that the introduction has caused challenges for many practice managers (although you are right in some PCNs the introduction has been handled much better than in others)

      Reply

  3. Amanda Says:

    Have to admit this makes me quite sad. Within our PCN we have over 30 members of ARRS staff which are shared over 4 locations. The ARRS staff underpin General Practice and plug many gaps within practices, our practices for instance would be stuck without our Pharmacy teams and are well respected within practices, if this workforce is not more valued by the economy we will loose them, excellent clinicians who bring valuable experience and support to patients. Articles like this do not help make them feel supported, not valued.

    Reply

  4. Steve Williams Says:

    Fail to prepare , prepare to fail…
    No one said it was going to be easy but my local, regional and national antennae tell me that for Pharmacy Professionals it has worked really well, most of the time, and practices / PCN s would not dare be without their ARRS Medicines Experts now!
    It failed where practices / PCNs did not have , or give , clear direction (and support) as to what those professionals could & should , AND could & should NOT do, within their clinical competency AND within their allocated , limited, time.
    Supported teams flourished to help practices and improve medicines optimisation for 1000s of patients

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Get in the know!
newsletterpopup close icon
practice index weekly

Subscribe to the Weekly, our free email newsletter.

Keeping you updated and connected.