We've noticed your using a old browser this may cause issuse when experincing our site. We recommend updating your browser here this provides the latest browsers for you to download. This just makes sure your experince our website and all others websites in the best possible way. Close

A new contract? More like a new headache! – by Paula the PM

I’ve been expecting the new contract changes to arrive, so I’ve been keeping an eye on my emails more closely than usual.

At first glance, some of the changes seem relatively innocuous – that is, until you get to the ‘work late’ and ‘Saturday too’ bit.

It’s just slipped in there, almost as if we might not notice it, among the great raft of changes that are headed our way.

Strikingly, the ARRS will be expanded to include non-clinical support and Band 4 roles. It’s a good job really, because I suspect that the need to work evenings and Saturdays will be the straw that breaks the camel’s back for some of our existing staff.

We’ve always struggled to get staff to work extended hours, and while flu-clinic Saturdays are generally a total riot, I can’t imagine that I’m going to have staff queueing up to work them every week. As they haven’t yet released the Network Contract DES, I’m not sure how they’re planning on funding this, but I suspect that, as usual, there won’t be a huge uplift to our budget.

Assuming that they’re not going to raise the budget by much, are we just expected to move the capacity across the week? If that’s the case, I’m thinking we’ll need a consultation period with staff about the change of hours. I get enough grief when I try to get someone to swap a late shift, never mind asking someone to take it on permanently! Of course, I understand their reluctance; staff have often moved into general practice to try and regain a work-life balance after having worked shifts for years.

The letter appears to suggest that this amounts to the provision of normal services, across the team, with staff just working late every night and extending into Saturday. As we can’t adequately staff our existing hours, how are we expected to conjure up the extra? There has to be GP cover, so where are they suggesting that we find an extra day’s worth of GP time from? We’re currently paying GPs £££££ for regular sessions, as we can’t easily recruit, so are we looking at a situation where recruiting into those sessions will attract a premium? Given that a GP session is a nominal 4 hours and 10 minutes, does that mean that afternoon surgeries will need to start at 4pm? If they’ve worked a morning session, then is this now the equivalent of a split shift, or will the morning sessions be starting later too? What about blood requests and collections? They don’t happen in the evening, so there are going to be restrictions on what we can deliver.

I had to laugh as I read the paragraph about unused appointments… unused appointments – what the heck are they? It’s simply indicative of the inability of the folks at NHSE to actually see what’s in front of their faces! When do you suppose any of them last visited a practice this side of the desk? Or worked a shift, a day, a week in a practice, getting their hands dirty so to speak? I’d hazard a guess that the answer is somewhere between zero and the sum of diddly-squat. I’m tempted to send them a gold-plated invitation to see if they’d deign to visit, because I can’t see any other way to get the powers that be to understand why I think this is like attempting to boil the ocean. For practices where Saturday is a holy day, or where there are other religious needs to be taken into account, I can only hope that the catch-all “as agreed with the commissioner” will cover that.

I’m further astounded by the idea that ICSs will be consulted on the GP contract going forward. The idea that primary and secondary care covering massive geographical and population areas will all rub along happily for the same funding is at best optimistic. As we are barely consulted on the contract as it is, how this can be seen to be reassuring is completely beyond me.

So, if anyone has any ideas about how I get a quart out of a pint pot, I’d be very happy to hear them!

Paula

Rating

Paula the PM

Local Practice Manager

View all posts by Paula the PM
Primary care news round-up (18th April to 24th April 2024)

April 25, 2024

Looking back at 2023 – Practice Index’s most-read blogs

January 4, 2024

3 Responses to “A new contract? More like a new headache! – by Paula the PM”
  1. Will Bailey Says:

    The later hours and Saturday working look scary at first, but this is basically a rebadging of the existing extended hours and improved access provisions (provided for us by our local GP federation), except there will no longer be a need for cover on Sundays.
    Locally, the federation have made a good profit on this service over the last few years. They’ve indicated that they will be happy for us to subcontract to them. They will run it more or less at cost, meaning any surplus will sit in the PCN pot. There are some logistical changes required to their model, but nothing which is impossible, and it’ll be for them to worry about not me.

    Reply

  2. Robin Noel Says:

    I had the misfortune to virtually attend the NHSE General Practice Webinar last night (3rd March). The two presenters, Dr Ursula Montgomery and Dr Nikki Kanani response to our questions about where are we getting the extra staff from, was that this was apparently ‘agreed’ in 2019 and it wasn’t their problem, as it is up to our local commissioners to come up with a solution to this issue…this mantra was repeated a number of times. They were trying to sell it as a positive thing for general practice and apparently, the majority of us on the webinar were really positive and can do about the challenge! They must have been looking at a different set of questions to what I was seeing. The economic and political landscape has changed dramatically since 2019 (a pandemic, current threat of WW3, inflation shooting up and energy prices through the roof) and as such, they need to recognise that Enhanced Access has to be reviewed or they are just setting general practice up to fail.

    Reply

  3. Tracey Says:

    I, too, was disheartened to read the contract, mainly at the expectation that we can just find the staff to cover the extended hours. For us, it’s 12 hours a week and there’s no way we can provide this without removing 12 clinical hours from core hours between Monday to Friday. Clinical staff are already working above and beyond so to squeeze more from them would probably cause at best a request to reduce their sessions which is counterproductive, or at worst possible resignations. ARRS staff are brilliant during the week but I doubt they will want to work weekends either. We may have to resort to employing ‘Saturday only reception staff’, ie people who just want a Saturday job, as I doubt any of our frazzled reception team would welcome having to work all day Saturday.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Get in the know!
newsletterpopup close icon
practice index weekly

Subscribe to the Weekly, our free email newsletter.

Keeping you updated and connected.